I was aware of those rumours, as it happens. But the general public perception is that he was unimpeachable. In truth, I struggle to think of a single 20th century martyr who was wholly without detractors: John Paul II (paedophile apologist); MLK (philanderer); Mandela (erstwhile terrorist); Mother Teresa (who was, according to Hitchens, “a lying, thieving Albanian dwarf”.) Perhaps the real difference is that today a figure’s foibles can topple them even while still in positions of power, while in the past they merely besmirch the memory.